Illustrative sample
No customer documents used
Tender risk report
Riverside Apartments · Pre-pricing first read
Commercial risks
7
Missing information
12
Questions to raise
9
Priority review points
Ground condition assumptions are not defined
High
The sample Employer's Requirements refer to existing surveys but do not state which party carries the risk of differing conditions.
Design responsibility needs a clear boundary
Review
Several performance clauses imply contractor design without identifying deliverables, review periods or acceptance criteria.
Programme information is incomplete
Review
A completion date is shown, but access dates, sectional completion and information-release dates are absent from the sample pack.
Executive summary
The sample pack gives enough information for an initial scope review, but commercial allowances should remain qualified until design responsibility, site-condition risk and programme milestones are confirmed.
Key date
18 September
Illustrative tender return date
Questions to raise before pricing
- 01Confirm which ground surveys form part of the tender information and who owns the risk of variance.
- 02Provide a design responsibility matrix covering temporary and permanent works.
- 03Issue the tender programme with access, information-release and sectional-completion dates.
Controlled pilot
Want this structure applied to a live tender?
Create an account and submit project-level details. TenderPilot will confirm a secure pilot route before requesting documents.
Request pilot access